Síguenos

Contact us:

(+52) 55 5129 4440

(+52) 33 2323 3085

Regularización de Concesiones de Agua: Guía Esencial 2026 para Empresas en México

Water Concession Regularization: Essential Guide 2026 for Companies in Mexico

The regularization of national water concessions formally began on July 16, 2026, one day after the publication of the corresponding agreement in the Official Gazette of the Federation. Signed by the Director General of the National Water Commission, Efraín Morales López, the instrument opens a twelve-month window for individuals, ejidos (communal landholdings), municipalities, and irrigation districts to bring their expired water rights up to date between 2009 and July 2026. However, this opportunity comes with concrete risks: those who do not act within the deadline could face the expiration of unused water volumes. Therefore, understanding the true scope of the agreement is essential for any company with operations that depend on water resources in Mexico.

What does the water concession regularization agreement establish?

The instrument published on July 15, 2026, implements temporary administrative simplification measures. It applies to concession and allocation titles whose validity expired between January 1, 2009, and the agreement's entry into force. The condition is that the interested party had not requested an extension, or had submitted it after the deadline. The measures cover domestic, urban public, agricultural, livestock, and aquaculture uses. Agro-industrial use is expressly excluded, in accordance with Article 2, Section 17, of the Regulations of the National Water Law.

Línea de tiempo del acuerdo de regularización de concesiones de agua 2026-2027

Twelve months of validity: from July 16, 2026 to July 15, 2027.

Regarding the beneficiaries, the agreement distinguishes three profiles. Irrigation districts, irrigation units, and ejidos (communal landholdings) can regularize their water usage without volume limits. Similarly, state and municipal governments that directly provide water services are exempt from volume limits. Individuals, however, have a limit of one million cubic meters per year. It is worth noting that this scheme aligns with the 2024-2030 National Water Plan, whose fourth pillar seeks comprehensive and transparent water management.

The program's legal basis is anchored in Article 24 of the National Water Law, which regulates concession extensions, and in the law's regulations. For its part, the authority justifies the measure as a direct response to what it has termed the "black market" for water rights, that is, the informal transfer of rights without the knowledge or control of the National Water Commission (Conagua).

🔗 EXTERNAL LINK: See the full agreement in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF) → https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5793639&fecha=15/07/2026

Requirements to access the regularization of water concessions

Thirteen requirements are necessary to qualify for the program, and none are optional. Among the most important are having a property in operation for the last two years, having a meter installed, and being up-to-date on payments for the last five fiscal years. Additionally, the applicant must not have any pending administrative sanction proceedings related to the property title they intend to regularize.

This documentary requirement is not accidental. Consequently, the Federal Government seeks to regulate the concession system and reduce the informal market for permits to extract groundwater. Centralized control falls to Conagua through the National Public Water Registry, which will compile information on ownership, authorized volumes, and actual water use reported by each concession holder.

Minimum recommended documentation

  • Certified copy of the original concession or assignment title
  • Proof of payment of fees for the last five fiscal years
  • Photographic and technical evidence of the capture work in operation
  • Certificate of no outstanding debt with the National Water Commission
  • Report of extracted volumes, when a meter is installed.

In practice, several errors delay the process: submitting the title without proof of payment for the last five years, or failing to report that the water intake structure has changed location without formal registration with Conagua (the National Water Commission). For example, if the authority detects inconsistencies between the reported volume and the actual usage observed in the field, the process can be suspended until the discrepancy is clarified. Therefore, it is advisable to gather all the necessary documentation from the beginning, rather than waiting for a later request.

⚖️ Do you have questions about this topic? The lawyers at Baráibar & Asociados in Mexico City can guide you. Schedule your consultation today.

Risk of expiration if the regularization of water concessions is not addressed in time

Anyone who chooses to ignore this administrative window faces a quantifiable risk. The agreement instructs Conagua to verify, for two years after its entry into force, the actual use of the allocated water volumes. For its part, the authority will conduct reconciliation processes to adjust the authorized volume to the volume actually used, taking into account national water security and the marginalization index of the populations involved.

For businesses, this means that unused water rights could be subject to expiration. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain robust documentation regarding water usage, metering, and timely payment of fees. If the entire allocated volume is not used, companies can also initiate procedure CONAGUA-01-019 to interrupt the expiration of the rights corresponding to the unused volumes.

Let's consider the case of a medium-sized agro-industrial plant that was granted a specific water allocation a decade ago, but which today consumes only a fraction of that amount. Under the new system, that difference could be returned to the national water supply without any compensation. Therefore, conducting an internal audit of actual consumption becomes a preventative measure, not just an administrative one.

🔗 INTERNAL LINK: Learn how to defend yourself against acts of administrative authority → https://baraibar.com.mx/reforma-lfpca-2026/

Impact of the regularization of water concessions on industrial and infrastructure sectors

Although this first phase is aimed at non-industrial uses, its effects extend to sectors with higher water consumption. The December 2025 reform to the National Water Law replaced traditional mechanisms for transferring water rights with reassignment schemes subject to the direct intervention of the National Water Commission (Conagua). It also incorporated a national water reserve fund to reincorporate unused volumes and limited the validity of the water guarantee to a maximum of five years.

Tabla comparativa del régimen anterior y el nuevo régimen de concesiones de agua en México

The new scheme centralizes the reassignment of water rights in Conagua.

These measures have direct relevance for water-intensive manufacturing, mining, energy, and data center projects. Any water rights management for new developments must be processed directly with Conagua, with no option to acquire water volumes through private transfer of water rights with a change of use.

A concrete example illustrates the change. Before the reform, a manufacturing company could acquire additional water volumes by purchasing a water rights from another concessionaire, with a simple subsequent notification to Conagua (the National Water Commission). Today, however, that same operation requires demonstrating to the authority that the corresponding basin has actual water availability, which can considerably lengthen the planning time for a new industrial project.

Sectors with greater exposure to the new regime

  • Manufacturing and data centers: They require constant volumes and depend entirely on the direct allocation of Conagua.
  • Mining: It faces greater scrutiny under the new water crimes regime incorporated in the December 2025 reform.
  • Real estate development: You should verify the actual availability of water before committing to new projects.
  • Agribusiness: Although excluded from this first stage, it must anticipate future phases of sectoral regularization.

Therefore, legal and corporate compliance departments must incorporate this new regime into their water risk assessment before initiating any project that requires a new concession.

Implications for irrigation districts, communal lands, and agricultural operations

Irrigation districts, irrigation units, and ejidos are among the main beneficiaries of the agreement, as they can regularize their water titles without volume limits. However, this advantage does not exempt these entities from complying with the thirteen general requirements, including proof of an operational project for the past two years.

In practice, many irrigation districts operate infrastructure built decades ago, with documentation scattered across various agencies. Therefore, the first recommended step is to reconstruct the technical file for each permit before contacting Conagua directly. Otherwise, the lack of an organized file can prolong the process beyond what is expected.

Furthermore, the volume reconciliation stipulated in the agreement will take into account food security and the marginalization index of the beneficiary populations. Consequently, municipalities that directly provide drinking water services should take advantage of the absence of volume limits to regularize all of their supply sources, thus avoiding future disputes with the National Water Commission.

📋 Don't face this process alone. At Baráibar & Asociados, we have specialists in Administrative and Corporate Law ready to defend your interests in Mexico City.

Legal context: from the National Water Law to the General Water Law

For nearly three decades, the 1992 National Water Law regulated the granting of concessions under a primarily administrative approach, with little emphasis on tracing actual water use. However, this approach changed with the December 2025 reform, which substantially modified the National Water Law itself and gave rise to the new General Water Law.

The General Water Law, published on December 11, 2025, is based on a different premise: water is no longer understood as a mere commodity but is expressly recognized as a human right. This paradigm shift translates into concrete mechanisms, such as the national water reserve fund and the limitation of the guaranteed quota to five years.

In this context, the agreement to regularize water concessions serves as the first operational instrument of this new policy. It does not modify the existing legal framework, but it does put it into practice by offering a concrete administrative process for clearing the registry of expired permits. It is also worth noting that this transition coincides with a strengthening of the sanctions regime, aimed at penalizing unauthorized water extraction and the misuse of hydraulic infrastructure.

For businesses, understanding this regulatory evolution is not an academic exercise. How Conagua interprets and applies the water concession regularization agreement in the coming months will set the tone for the program's subsequent stages. Therefore, it is advisable to closely monitor the operational criteria that the authority publishes, rather than assuming that the text of the agreement contains all the relevant information for the process.

🔗 EXTERNAL LINK: Consult the current text of the General Water Law → https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGAg.pdf

How to prepare for the new water policy in Mexico

The regularization of water concessions should be understood as part of a broader policy of traceability and state control over water resources. For companies, this means proactively reviewing the status of each concession title and assessing the advisability of joining the program before its expiration on July 15, 2027.

Recommended steps before applying for regularization

  1. Internally audit all current or expired concession and allocation titles.
  2. Verify the installation and calibration of extraction meters.
  3. Gather proof of payment of fees for the last five fiscal years.
  4. Confirm that there are no open sanctioning procedures before Conagua.
  5. Submit the application with specialized legal support before the twelve-month period expires.

It is also advisable to review any pending concession, extension, or modification procedures, as the agreement allows for the registration of favorable resolutions issued since April 1, 2019, in the National Public Water Registry. Otherwise, the risk of losing unused volumes will increase as Conagua progresses with its verification processes.

🔗 INTERNAL LINK: Review the implications of the 2025 Amparo Law for companies in Mexico City → https://baraibar.com.mx/reforma-ley-de-amparo-2025-empresas-cdmx-2/

⚖️ Protect your company's water resources with expert legal advice from Baráibar & Asociados.

Conclusion

The regularization of water concessions represents a limited-time opportunity, not a mere administrative formality. Those with permits that expired between 2009 and July 2026 must act within the twelve-month validity period of the agreement to avoid the expiration of unused water volumes. Furthermore, the new water traceability regime requires companies in all sectors to strengthen their documentation submitted to Conagua (the National Water Commission). Finally, having specialized legal support makes all the difference between taking advantage of the regularization window and facing costly expiration proceedings in the future.

Frequently asked questions about the regularization of water concessions

Who can access the regularization of water concessions in 2026?

Irrigation districts, irrigation units, ejidos, federal entities, municipalities and individuals with titles that expired between 2009 and July 2026 can access it, in accordance with the agreement published in the DOF on July 15, 2026 and article 24 of the National Water Law.

What happens if I don't regularize my concession within the deadline?

The unused volume may be subject to a declaration of forfeiture. Conagua will verify actual usage during the two years following the entry into force of the agreement, in accordance with the powers granted to it by the current National Water Law.

Does the agreement apply to industrial use concessions?

Not directly, since the agreement expressly excludes agro-industrial use volumes, in accordance with article 2, section 17, of the Regulations of the National Water Law, although the general traceability regime does affect industrial sectors.

How long does the regularization agreement remain valid?

It is valid for 365 calendar days starting on July 16, 2026, so the term ends on July 15, 2027, as established in the agreement itself published in the Official Gazette of the Federation.

What documents do I need to start the process with Conagua?

Among other documents, a certified copy of the title, proof of payment of fees for the last five fiscal years, evidence of the work in operation and proof of no debt are required, in accordance with the thirteen requirements set out in the agreement.

Can I avoid expiration if I don't use my entire allocated volume?

Yes, it is possible to initiate the CONAGUA-01-019 procedure to interrupt the expiration of rights related to unused volumes, provided that a justified cause is proven before the corresponding authority.

Legal references: Official Gazette of the Federation (July 15, 2026); National Water Law and its Regulations; General Water Law (DOF, December 11, 2025); National Water Plan 2024-2030.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute formal legal advice or establish an attorney-client relationship.

Reforma LFPCA 2026: Guía Definitiva para el Nuevo Juicio Contencioso Administrativo en México

LFPCA Reform 2026: Definitive Guide for the New Administrative Litigation Trial in Mexico

The 2026 Federal Law on Administrative Litigation (LFPCA) reform, which came into effect on June 10, 2026, represents one of the most significant changes to federal administrative litigation since the consolidation of the Online Justice System. Published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on June 9, 2026, this reform profoundly alters how companies and individuals must defend their rights before the Federal Court of Administrative Justice (TFJA). Therefore, if your company has ongoing tax, customs, or administrative litigation—or anticipates it in the near future—this analysis is essential to avoid being at a procedural disadvantage.

LFPCA Reform 2026, why does it mark a before and after?

The Federal Law of Administrative Litigation Procedure (LFPCA) regulates the legal process through which individuals and companies challenge resolutions issued by federal authorities, primarily the Tax Administration Service (SAT), the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP), the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), and various regulatory agencies. However, prior to this reform, the legal framework lacked mandatory deadlines for the Tribunal's actions, leading to procedural uncertainty and unpredictable resolution times.

The 2026 LFPCA reform substantially changes this paradigm. First, it imposes specific deadlines for the TFJA to carry out actions that previously lacked a legal timeframe. Furthermore, it deepens the digitization of the procedure and expands the summary procedure. However, and this is crucial, it also redistributes procedural burdens to the detriment of the individual: it reduces the value of annulments due to procedural defects and grants the authority broader discretion to reinstate annulled acts.

Consequently, the reform is not neutral. It requires litigants to rethink their strategy from the initial pleading stage, strengthen their substantive arguments, and more rigorously monitor the electronic case file and notifications via the Jurisdictional Bulletin.

⚖️ Do you have questions about this reform? The lawyers at Baráibar & Asociados in Mexico City can guide you. Schedule your consultation today.

 

New mandatory deadlines: the LFPCA reform 2026 sets time limits for the TFJA

One of the most visible changes in the 2026 LFPCA reform is the incorporation of express deadlines for actions that previously lacked a legal time limit. Similarly, limits are established for procedural acts by the parties. Among the most relevant are the following:

The Federal Court of Administrative Justice (TFJA) will have five business days to rule on any motion unless the law establishes a different deadline. This same timeframe also applies to admitting or dismissing claims, amendments, responses, and appearances, once the corresponding preliminary requirements have been met. The final judgment in summary proceedings must be issued within a maximum of six months from the date the claim is admitted, subject to suspensions resulting from incidental proceedings or appeals.

Nuevos plazos en la reforma LFPCA 2026

           Comparison of procedural deadlines

However, it is important to emphasize that failure to meet these deadlines does not, in itself, result in a deemed resolution or the automatic loss of jurisdiction of the court. Its practical effectiveness will depend on the oversight and enforcement mechanisms provided for in the Law. Therefore, having specialized legal counsel is essential to take advantage of these deadlines as a defense tool.

Digitization of the trial: hybrid file and electronic notifications

The 2026 LFPCA reform takes a further step in the digitization of administrative litigation. Although individuals retain the right to choose between traditional and online proceedings, the reform allows the defendant authority and third parties to appear and submit arguments electronically, even within a case being processed through traditional means. In such cases, the TFJA (Federal Court of Administrative Justice) must print and certify the electronic filings and documents for inclusion in the physical case file.

However, the most critical change for businesses is the modification to the notification system via the Jurisdictional Bulletin. Once the new Article 65 is in effect, the notification will take effect on the second business day following publication, instead of the third business day previously stipulated. This reduces the litigant's time to react. Therefore, maintaining daily and independent monitoring of the Bulletin—without relying exclusively on email notifications—becomes an urgent and practical necessity.

Likewise, when submitting digitized documents, the applicant must declare, under oath, whether they are originals, certified copies, or simple copies. Failure to do so will create a presumption, to the detriment of the offeror, that the document is a simple copy.

Expansion of the summary procedure: benefit or strategic trap?

The 2026 LFPCA reform expands the scope of summary proceedings by increasing the threshold amount from fifteen to thirty times the Unit of Measurement and Update (UMA) per year. It also expressly incorporates resolutions issued by tax authorities in response to refund requests for overpayments or payments made in error. In principle, this may reduce the time required for disputes involving small and medium amounts.

However, the summary procedure also reduces the time available to obtain documents, prepare expert opinions, or gather technical information during the proceedings. Therefore, if your case falls under this procedure, the lawsuit must be filed with a practically complete theory of the case and evidentiary record from the outset. Similarly, the grounds for appeal must be solid and focused on the merits, because the time to develop them after filing the lawsuit will be minimal.

📋 Don't face this process alone. At Baráibar & Asociados, we have specialists in Administrative and Tax Law ready to defend your interests in Mexico City.

 

Changes in the suspension of the contested act: less burden, more risks

The reform eliminates the requirement to prove that the execution of the challenged act could cause irreparable harm or damage. This ostensibly facilitates access to provisional relief. Therefore, obtaining a stay of the act should, in theory, be simpler for the individual.

However, the reform introduces two new scenarios in which a suspension will be considered to affect the public interest or violate public order: when it allows the continuation of activities requiring federal permits, authorizations, or concessions without them; or when it allows the commission or continuation of conduct that constitutes an infraction or crime. For companies in regulated sectors—energy, telecommunications, finance, and customs—these categories represent a real risk. In these cases, the suspension request must precisely define its effects and demonstrate that the measure only preserves the subject matter of the lawsuit.

Formal nullities and replacement of acts: strategic impact for companies

One of the most strategically impactful changes of the 2026 LFPCA reform concerns the reinstatement of actions annulled due to procedural or formal defects. The tax authority will have four months to reinstate the procedure and issue a new resolution—or one month in summary proceedings—even if, in tax matters, the time limits established in Articles 46-A, 50, or 67 of the Federal Tax Code have expired.

Flujo de nulidad y reposición de actos bajo la reforma LFPCA 2026

When there is nullity due to formal defects, the authority can replace the act within 4 months.

This amendment reduces the possibility that a formal annulment could, simply through the passage of time, become a definitively favorable ruling for the individual. Therefore, defense strategies based solely on procedural or formal defects lose some of their effectiveness. Instead, it will be necessary to strengthen substantive appeals and expressly request an analysis of the substantive arguments. It is worth noting that, as a counterbalance, the reform does strengthen the mechanisms for enforcing judgments: it shortens deadlines and allows for fines of 300 to 1,000 times the UMA (Unit of Measurement and Update) against authorities who unjustifiably fail to comply.

Expanded tax review: the 2026 LFPCA reform and ANAM on the scene

The 2026 LFPCA reform also modifies the tax review process. The general threshold for the amount in controversy is set at 27,000 times the Unit of Measurement and Update (UMA) in effect at the time of the resolution or judgment. Furthermore, certain resolutions issued at the complaint stage are included, and the National Customs Agency of Mexico (ANAM) and its administrative units are expressly recognized as authorities authorized to file appeals in matters within their jurisdiction.

In practice, this means that a favorable ruling based solely on procedural violations may cease to be final in high-value disputes. Likewise, in the customs arena, the express incorporation of the ANAM reinforces the need to build a technically sound case file from the outset in matters of tariff classification, customs valuation, origin of goods, and non-tariff regulations. However, the reform also opens the door to greater procedural certainty in lower-value cases where tax review is no longer applicable.

⚖️ Protect your company's rights with expert legal advice from Baráibar & Asociados. Contact us today.

 

Conclusion: the 2026 LFPCA reform requires a more strategic defense from the outset

The 2026 LFPCA reform is not a minor technical update. It is a turning point that requires a rethinking of litigation strategy in administrative courts. Therefore, companies with current or future litigation before the TFJA must take immediate action: classify their cases according to the rules of deferred effect, strengthen their monitoring of the Jurisdictional Bulletin, prepare advance evidentiary files, and review the strength of their substantive arguments.

At Baráibar & Asociados, our specialists in Administrative and Tax Law in Mexico City are ready to guide you through this transition. Schedule a consultation and protect your company's interests under the new procedural framework.

 

Frequently Asked Questions about the LFPCA 2026 Reform

1. When did the LFPCA 2026 reform come into effect?

The 2026 Federal Law on Administrative Procedure (LFPCA) reform entered into force on June 10, 2026, one day after its publication in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF), with the exception of certain provisions with deferred implementation (Article 6 Bis in February 2027 and hybrid procedures in December 2026). Legal basis: Transitory Article One of the Decree published on June 9, 2026.

2. What is the deadline for the TFJA to agree to a promotion under the LFPCA 2026 reform?

The Federal Court of Administrative Justice (TFJA) has five business days to rule on any motion unless otherwise specified by law. This same timeframe applies to admitting or dismissing claims and responses. However, failure to meet this deadline does not, in itself, result in a deemed decision or loss of jurisdiction. Basis: new Article 6 Bis of the Federal Law of Administrative Procedure (LFPCA).

3. Does the burden of proof change in order to obtain the suspension of the challenged act?

Yes. The 2026 LFPCA reform eliminates the requirement to prove irreparable damages. However, it introduces two new grounds for harm to the public interest: activities that require authorization but lack it, and conduct that constitutes an infraction or crime. Companies in regulated sectors should carefully evaluate their case before requesting a suspension. Basis: reforms to Articles 24 and 28 of the LFPCA.

4. What if the authority annuls my act due to a procedural defect under the new law?

The authority will have four months (one of which will be a summary proceeding) to reinstate the procedure and issue a new ruling, even if the time limits established in Article 46-A or 67 of the Federal Tax Code have expired. This reduces the strategic advantage of formal annulments and reinforces the importance of also challenging the merits of the case. Legal basis: new Article 52, last paragraph, Federal Law of Administrative Procedure.

5. What is the hybrid file in the LFPCA 2026 reform?

This is the system that allows the defendant authority and third parties to submit electronic documents within a trial conducted through traditional means. The Federal Court of Administrative Justice (TFJA) must print and certify the electronic documents for inclusion in the physical case file. This provision will enter into force on December 6, 2026. Legal basis: Article 19, second paragraph as amended, and Transitory Article Five of the Federal Law of Administrative Procedure (LFPCA).

6. Can ANAM initiate the tax review process?

Yes. The 2026 LFPCA reform expressly recognizes the National Customs Agency of Mexico and its administrative units as authorities authorized to file tax review appeals in matters within their jurisdiction, provided that the threshold of 27,000 times the UMA (Unit of Measurement and Update) is met. Legal basis: Article 63, amended sections, LFPCA.

 

Legal references:

🔗 DOF — Decreto que reforma la LFPCA, 9 de junio de 2026

🔗 Tribunal Federal de Justicia Administrativa — TFJA

🔗 Strategic Guide — Reform to the Amparo Law 2025 for companies

🔗 Statute of limitations for civil liability for created risk: 10 years

 

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute formal legal advice or establish an attorney-client relationship.